Categories: Education

Gujarat HC seeks govt’s reply over GUJLISH project in Surat schools

According to the petitioner, the implementation of the English requirement in Gujarati-medium institutions has led to a decline in student performance.

Gujarat HC seeks govt’s reply over GUJLISH project: Tuesday in Ahmedabad, the Gujarat high court ordered the state education authorities to file a response to a PIL challenging the policy of teaching in the English language to Gujarati-medium students in Classes 1 through 10 in the Surat district.

Gujarat HC seeks govt’s reply over GUJLISH project in Surat schools

According to the petitioner, the implementation of the English requirement in Gujarati-medium institutions has led to a decline in student performance. During the hearing, Anand Yagnik, the petitioner’s attorney, complained that more than two years have passed since the state government was instructed to respond to the PIL, yet no response has been lodged. In the meantime, the government has also begun implementing the new education policy. The bench presided over by Acting Chief Justice A.J. Desai ordered the state government and education authorities to respond by August 10.

The PIL has objected to the implementation of Project GUJLISH in the Surat district in 2016, as recommended by the district education superintendent of Surat. The Gujarati-medium institutions have been instructed to teach in English the terminology and primary content of fundamental and elementary subjects such as mathematics, science, and the environment. The goal of the initiative was to preserve Gujarati as a mother tongue, enhance students’ comprehension, teach them English, and improve their performance on competitive and entrance exams. A small number of schools were selected for the pilot initiative, after which the model was to be replicated.

The petitioner asserted that none of the objectives have been met, and they are consequently quite dissatisfied. Students’ performance declined as a result of this endeavour, with some even failing. The pupils were incapable of visualising and comprehending the fundamental subjects.

The petitioner has argued that the concept of providing education in one’s mother tongue is inconsequential and has caused immeasurable hardship for parents and students, as there are numerous families in which no one speaks English. They demanded that the initiative be halted due to the lack of research that preceded its implementation.

Eduvast Desk

Recent Posts

NET10 Activation Guide: How to Activate Your Phone, Hotspot and Home Phone

Activating a NET10 phone, hotspot or home phone doesn’t have to be complicated. Follow the…

2 hours ago

Hoopla Digital Activation Guide: How to Activate Hoopla on Roku, Fire TV and Smart TVs

Hoopla lets library members stream movies, TV shows and more for free. Here’s how to…

2 days ago

TruTV Activation Guide: How to Activate TruTV on Roku, FireStick, Android TV and Apple TV

TruTV activation is simple on Roku, FireStick, Android TV and Apple TV. Learn how to…

2 days ago

How Much Money Do You Need to Retire at 65? Check the Savings You May Need

Retiring at 65 can require a large savings fund, but the exact amount depends on…

4 days ago

Social Security Claiming Age Clarity Act: Retirement Age Is Not Going Up

Social Security retirement rules are not changing, but a new bill could rename key claiming…

6 days ago

SNAP Benefits 2026: New Work Requirements And Rules That Could Affect Your Food Assistance

SNAP benefits are facing major changes in 2026, with expanded work requirements and higher state…

6 days ago