Top 16 Failed Products In the Last 5 Years: In this article, we will look at the 16 products that failed in the last five years. Because consumer markets are ever-changing, firms face both opportunities and risks when new items are introduced. Many products have encountered difficulties in the last five years and have finally failed to find long-term success in the market.
The COVID-19 pandemic was an unprecedented worldwide event that caused supply chain disruptions, changed consumer tastes, and redefined the competitive landscape. As a result, firms in a variety of industries faced severe problems.
Nearly 90% of businesses reported supply chain interruptions during the epidemic, which had a major negative influence on their capacity to deliver goods efficiently, according to McKinsey & Company. The extensive impact on corporate performance was highlighted by publicly traded companies including Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) and Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) which reported revenue declines as a result of these interruptions.
During the epidemic, consumer behavior shifted toward digital consumption and online shopping. In 2020, online sales increased by 32% over the previous year as more people shifted to e-commerce platforms. Consumers readily accepted digital goods and services despite the difficulties faced by brick-and-mortar merchants.
Aside from the epidemic, companies launching new products faced heightened competition and consumer demands for product excellence, novelty, and value. According to Nielsen research, social responsibility, sustainability, and transparency have an impact on consumer trust.
Every product, from cutting-edge consumer items to well-known tech devices, experienced particular difficulties that ultimately led to the failure of numerous well-known companies’ products. Publicly traded firms like Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG), for example, had difficulties when releasing devices like the Google Pixel 4, which disappointed users and reviewers with their poor battery life and lack of cutting-edge features.
Top 25 Countries with Strongest Military Power in the World
Innovation is a major source of competitive advantage in today’s corporate environment. Innovation without sufficient customer insights, market research, and risk assessment can be costly. Taking lessons from past mistakes can help businesses improve their products, innovate more effectively, and better match their offerings to the needs of their customers.
Collaborations with distributors, suppliers, and industry specialists can also yield useful information and resources. Collaboration and knowledge sharing enable companies to detect potential problems and develop product strategies.
Technological advances, evolving consumer inclinations, and unparalleled worldwide disruptions require enterprises to maintain flexibility, agility, and a customer-centric approach to effectively navigate the turbulent waters of contemporary commerce. Understanding and improving past failures can help businesses achieve sustainable growth and success.
In the Past Five Years, 16 Products Have Failed
16. LG G8 ThinQ (2019)
Rating: 1
In a competitive market, LG’s G8 ThinQ offered cutting-edge technologies like Hand ID and Air Motion gestures. Customers, however, found these features gimmicky rather than useful. G8 ThinQ’s features and design also fell short of those of rivals with comparable or better performance.
LG’s marketing campaigns didn’t communicate the device’s value proposition well, which hurt sales. When the G8 ThinQ failed, it was difficult to compete in the fiercely competitive smartphone market.
15. LG Rollable Smartphone (2021)
Rating: 2
At CES 2021, LG’s rollable smartphone prototype revolutionized mobile device design with its unique form factor. Rollable smartphone manufacturing was halted after LG abruptly exited the smartphone market.
Innovative engineering and design made the rollable smartphone an unparalleled viewing experience. LG’s strategic retreat from smartphones casts doubt on its commitment to mobile innovation. Customers of the rollable smartphone were dissatisfied with its cancellation, which also highlighted how challenging it is to start large-scale projects in rapidly evolving markets.
14. Sony Xperia 1 (2019)
Rating: 2
Sony’s Xperia 1 was designed to deliver superior features and a cinematic viewing experience. Several issues prevented the gadget from becoming popular. Despite its high price tag, the Xperia 1’s camera was subpar compared to its competitors. Further limiting its reach were its distribution restrictions through certain carriers and retailers.
The Xperia 1’s tall and narrow form factor drew criticism for being uncomfortable to handle and use. Despite Sony’s reputation for quality and innovation in consumer electronics, the Xperia 1 failed to attract customers searching for a flagship smartphone with an appealing value offer. Poor sales and market performance were evidence of this.
13. Uber Jump Electric Bikes (2019)
Rating: 2
Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) planned to provide users with an eco-friendly and convenient form of transportation with its ambitious electric bike sharing business. Nevertheless, a number of issues prevented the service from succeeding. varying cities had varying regulations, such as different permit requirements and limits on where bikes could be parked, which made things more complicated to operate and less accessible in some places. Additionally, Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) had severe financial difficulties as a result of theft and vandalism of Jump bikes, which necessitated ongoing replacement and maintenance.
Top Rainiest Cities: List and Rankings in the World 2024
Further straining the service’s profitability were operational issues like redistributing bikes and managing batteries. Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:UBER) faced difficulties when introducing Jump bikes, despite the company’s early support for electric bike sharing as an environmentally friendly mode of transportation. This demonstrated the difficulties in executing urban mobility projects in the face of operational and regulatory obstacles.
12. Google Pixel 4 (2019)
Rating: 3
The Google Pixel 4 flagship smartphone from Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) received negative feedback for a number of issues, falling short of the standards set by its predecessors. Even though Google is known for creating cutting-edge software, the Pixel 4’s poor battery life—which made it difficult for it to go through a full day of use—disappointed both customers and critics. Furthermore, the gadget lacked novel features to set it apart from rivals in the congested smartphone industry.
Due to its expensive price tag and inferior hardware compared to its rivals, the Pixel 4 turned off prospective customers looking for value. Furthermore, reviews about Alphabet Inc.’s (NASDAQ:GOOG) choice to forego a fingerprint sensor in favor of face recognition technology were divided, with some users raising questions about the technology’s security and dependability. The poor reaction of the Pixel 4 highlighted the difficulties of succeeding in the extremely competitive smartphone industry without offering consumers a compelling value proposition or substantial innovation.
11. Nintendo Labo (2018-2019)
Rating: 3
Nintendo Labo was an inventive idea that brought interactive gaming experiences for the Nintendo Switch system along with DIY cardboard components. Nintendo Labo initially excited gamers and families with the launch of many kits offering different entertainment opportunities. However, after the first launch period, interest waned due to the novelty of the cardboard construction and minimal replay value.
Nintendo Labo failed to sustain momentum despite providing distinctive gaming experiences because of its high price point in comparison to its perceived value. Its appeal was further restricted and its decrease in popularity was aided by the absence of upgrades and continued support for new Labo kits. Although Nintendo Labo demonstrated Nintendo’s inventiveness and dedication to invention, its inability to maintain interest set the stage for the difficulties of releasing novel gaming ideas into a cutthroat industry without taking into account the core desires and wants of users.
10. Segway PT (Personal Transporter) (2001-2020)
Rating: 3
The Segway PT was introduced as a ground-breaking form of personal mobility and attracted a lot of interest. With its elegant design and self-balancing technology, the Segway promised to revolutionize personal mobility and urban commuting. But its expensive cost and specialized appeal prevented it from being widely used outside of a few specialist areas, such security and travel.
Safety concerns and legal restrictions have also impeded the widespread use of the Segway PT in urban settings. Segway failed to shake off its reputation as a novelty or upscale product, even after making an effort to broaden its product portfolio and reach new markets. The iconic personal transporter, the Segway PT, came to an end in 2020 when the firm decided to stop producing it.
9. Google+ (2011-2019)
Rating: 4
Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) launched Google+ as an attempt to counter Facebook’s hegemony in the social networking space. When Google+ first launched, it had a sizable user base thanks to features like Circles for personalized sharing and Hangouts for group video conversations. However, because of the intricate user interface and problems with connectivity with other Google services, it was unable to retain momentum.
Additionally, the platform’s lack of compelling features in comparison to other social networks and its difficulties managing identities hindered its development. More security lapses, like as one in 2018 that revealed users’ personal information, eroded platform trust. Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) declared the shutdown of Google+ in 2019 despite attempts to revive it, citing low user engagement and the difficulty in resolving security issues.
8. Amazon Echo Loop (2019)
Rating: 4
Amazon demonstrated its entry into wearable technology with the Echo Loop, a smart ring that integrates Alexa. However, because of its unpleasant appearance and restricted functionality, the device did not catch on with users. The Echo Loop was not as versatile or useful as other Echo devices, including smart speakers and displays, even though it included basic voice assistant features.
Its large and noticeable form also made it unsuitable for daily use, which reduced its attractiveness to customers looking for a seamless and discrete smart assistant experience. The Echo Loop’s failure to catch on with customers despite Amazon’s marketing efforts highlights the difficulties in bringing new form factors to the wearable technology market without taking into account important user demands and preferences.
7. Google Stadia (2019)
Rating: 4
With Google Stadia from Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG), the company hopes to transform the gaming market by providing cloud-based gaming experiences that can be accessed on a variety of devices without requiring expensive hardware. With its announcement of smooth gaming and fast access to a library of games, Stadia created a lot of buzz. But the platform was not without its share of difficulties.
At debut, it had a small selection of games, and it had performance problems with latency and input lag. Customers were also uncertain about Stadia’s pricing structure and subscription plan, which made them hesitant to use the platform and doubtful. Industry observers and players alike criticized Stadia, despite Google’s infrastructure investments and relationships with game companies.
6. Google Clips (2018-2019)
Rating: 4
Google Clips, an AI-powered camera from Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG), was designed to use machine learning algorithms to catch unscripted moments. However, due to privacy issues and its limited capabilities, the device did not become widely adopted. Google made an effort to market Clips as a useful and cutting-edge camera attachment, but it didn’t receive the positive response it was hoping for.
Top 10 Smallest Districts: On the Basis of Land Area in India!
Customers expressed concerns about privacy in homes and public areas due to the device’s always-on recording capabilities. Additionally, the device’s limited capabilities and lack of user control over content creation reduced its appeal to customers looking for more flexible photographic solutions. Even though Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) tried to target a certain market segment with Clips, its sales and market reaction were poor due to its inability to solve basic user problems and provide appealing features.
5. Quibi (2020)
Rating: 4
Quibi launched a novel idea in streaming: premium short-form entertainment for mobile consumption. It has trouble attracting and retaining subscribers despite a lot of investment and support. Streaming services and a congested digital content market are obstacles to overcome for the platform.
Quibi’s limited profitability and high operational costs were due to its focus on high-end, high-budget content. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Quibi’s mobile-focused content was less appealing during lockdowns. Quibi announced its closure barely six months after its introduction despite massive marketing efforts.
4. (2015–2019) Amazon Dash Buttons
Rating: 5
Amazon made another failed product attempt with Dash Buttons, which aimed to make reordering home items easier with a single click. Nonetheless, the product’s dubious utility and restricted environmental sustainability drew criticism. Environmentalists were concerned about the waste that Dash Buttons produced when people threw them away after just one use. Additionally, Dash Buttons had a limited appeal to a specific market because they were only suitable for a small range of frequently purchased items.
Dash Buttons became less relevant as consumers changed their preferences to voice assistants and digital ordering. Amazon’s 2019 decision to stop offering Dash Buttons was a response to shifting customer preferences and the demand for more eco-friendly and adaptable shopping options.
3. Faraday Future FF 91 (2018-2019)
Rating: 5
The Faraday Future FF 91 electric car, with its cutting-edge features and superior technology, heralded as a game-changer in the automotive industry. But the business encountered several difficulties that made it difficult for the FF 91 to succeed on the market.
Inability to obtain capital for production of FF 91 raised questions about the company’s long-term sustainability. Production delays delayed the release of the FF 91 and undermined customer confidence. While the FF 91’s futuristic design and cutting-edge features initially generated excitement, the company’s inability to overcome operational and financial obstacles raised concerns about its viability.
2. (2011) MoviePass (2019)
Rating: 5
By providing a subscription service that allows customers to see an infinite number of movies for a set monthly charge, MoviePass upended the movie theater business. MoviePass, at once heralded as a game-changer, drew millions of users but faltered due to an unsound business plan.
The company suffered enormous losses as a result of its financially untenable offer of unlimited movies at a discounted price. It was also one of the most unsuccessful products of the previous five years due to frequent changes to subscription plans and limitations on the availability of movies, which infuriated consumers. Movie studios and theater chains retaliated against MoviePass by placing limitations and preventing access to well-known movies. With these difficulties and growing financial strain, MoviePass filed for bankruptcy in 2019.
1. 2019’s Samsung Galaxy Fold
Grade: 6
Samsung’s Galaxy Fold is the most anticipated product on our list of 16 unsuccessful launches. This product’s foldable display technology was intended to transform the smartphone market. However, just before its planned introduction, the gadget experienced serious problems.
Samsung decided to delay the introduction of the foldable display due to concerns about creases and breaks. Samsung did not calm durability concerns with the Galaxy Fold, which impacted the market reaction upon its release. Although some early problems were resolved in later versions, the problematic debut of the Galaxy Fold highlighted the challenges of launching new technology in the smartphone market.
