Chhattisgarh teacher recruitment matter: The School Education Department of Chhattisgarh is currently embroiled in a legal dispute emanating from its May 4, 2023 recruitment notice for teachers. The absence of subject-specific graduation requirements for teaching positions is at the core of the dispute, raising concerns that unqualified candidates may be assigned to teach subjects outside their expertise. The Supreme Court has sent notice to the state government, along with an application for a stay that was lodged with the petition. Within four weeks, the state government must submit a response to both the petition and the stay application.
Initially, the notification and advertisement for teacher recruitment were challenged before the Chhattisgarh High Court. The primary objection to the notification was the lack of subject-specific graduation requirements for teaching positions, which allowed candidates with degrees in unrelated disciplines to apply for positions for which they may not have been qualified. A graduate of Sanskrit could potentially instruct mathematics, and vice versa.
However, the High Court of Chhattisgarh disregarded the petition challenging the notification on the grounds that it was a policy decision made by the state government and therefore not subject to judicial review.
In response, the petitioner, represented by attorneys Kaustubh Shukla and Ajay Shrivastava, filed a petition for special leave with the Supreme Court challenging the decision of the High Court.
Chhattisgarh teacher recruitment matter
The petitioner argued that the government of Chhattisgarh’s notification and advertisement for teacher recruitment were undermining the quality of education in the state, particularly during the crucial formative years of child development. They argued that permitting incompetent teachers to teach unrelated subjects, such as a graduate of Hindi or Sanskrit teaching mathematics or science, would lower the quality of education overall.
In addition, it was asserted that the notification violated the Right to Education Act by lowering the calibre of education offered by the state government.
Additionally, the petitioner argued that only the legislative assembly had the authority to amend the recruitment rules, and that the amendment was inconsistent with the educational objectives of both state and central authorities. They argued that this comprised a grave violation of the fundamental right of children to a quality education.
The case was scheduled to be heard by the Bench of Justices J K Maheshwari and K V Vishwanathan on September 4, 2023.
Following careful consideration of counsel Shukla’s arguments, the Supreme Court issued notices to the state government, along with a stay application lodged with the petition. Within four weeks, the state government must submit a response to both the petition and the stay application.
During the Rajiv Yuva Mitan Sammelan on September 2, 2023, the recruitment of teachers in the Chhattisgarh Government’s Education Department, as outlined in the notification and advertisement dated May 4, 2023, was highlighted as a flagship recruitment scheme. The case is still unresolved before the Supreme Court, with further proceedings scheduled four weeks from now.
